Monday, March 8, 2021
  • Login
Dennis Law News
VISIT DENNIS LAW
  • Home
  • Election Petition
    • All Documents Filed in Court by the Parties
    • Live Updates of court hearing
    • Timelines
    • Know your Judges
    • Summaries of the processes
  • Latest News
  • International News
  • Opinions/Features
  • Follow the Case
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Election Petition
    • All Documents Filed in Court by the Parties
    • Live Updates of court hearing
    • Timelines
    • Know your Judges
    • Summaries of the processes
  • Latest News
  • International News
  • Opinions/Features
  • Follow the Case
No Result
View All Result
Dennis Law News
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinions/Features

Prof. Kwaku Azar Writes

by DennisLaw
January 20, 2021
in Opinions/Features
0
Prof. Kwaku Azar Writes
351
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The SC, this morning, set up the issues for determination in the 2020 election petition. The Court also provided a roadmap for the trial, which is set to begin on January 26, and ordered the parties to provide their lists of witnesses and any witness statements.

The Court also ordered the Respondents to file arguments in support of their request for the petition to be dismissed “in limine” (without a trial) and the petitioner to respond to the arguments. The Court indicated that a ruling on this motion will be in the final judgment, paving the way for a trial.

These orders drew strong objections from the petitioner who argued that the Court was impermissibly truncating the discovery process and imposing timelines that are oblivious of the circumstances and thereby potentially prejudicing his case.

An election petition, like many civic cases, has four phases: (1) Pleadings; (2) Discovery; (3) Trial and (4) Post-trial.

In the pleadings phase, the petitioner basically files a complaint, stating how he has been wronged and what reliefs he seeks. The respondents then answer the complaints.

Then comes the discovery phase where the parties ask each other and any relevant third parties questions about facts and evidence pertaining to the case. The purpose of this phase is to narrow the issues for trial and for the parties to sharpen their trial strategies.

In the trial phase, the parties bring witnesses to the Court to give testimony to support their case. The post-trial phase is devoted to issues, such as whether the judgment should be reviewed.

Today’s banter was about the intricate relationship between discovery and trial. The petitioner’s argument was that they had outstanding discovery requests and therefore it was improper for the Court to decide on the issues and ask them to produce their lists of witnesses and their statements.

To the petitioner, as long as discovery was ongoing, it was unjust for the Court to ask for witnesses and settle on issues. After all, the witnesses and the issues and their trial strategy are necessarily informed by the outcome of the discovery.

The Court, on the other hand, pointed out the strict timelines that it had to operate under the amended rules. These timelines necessitated that matters be expedited.

However, the petitioner sought, unsuccessfully, to draw the Court’s attention to the fact that the amended rules provided 5 days for discovery and pre-trial and that in any event case management required a conversation not mere directives.

The petitioner is also seeking a review of the Court’s ruling on their interrogatories. It is expected that this review might be dispensed with tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the CJ caught Dominic Akuritinga Ayine making faces and took strong exception to it. He apologized accordingly. One more reason to wear a mask —- nobody will notice if you make faces!

All bad things must come to an end. The curtain on the accidental presidency in USA will be drawn today. BIGLY!!!!

So too must the willful or negligent disenfranchisement of #SALL come to an end by holding immediate elections and holding accountable the tortfeasors.

Da Yie!

Source: Kwaku Azar
DennisLaw

DennisLaw

Next Post
Election Petition: Note the difference between the 2012 and 2020 Court

Original copies of Memorandum of Issues filed by parties in 2020 Election Petition.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

I came to support my best friend – Amenuvor explains his presence at Ayine’s contempt hearing

I came to support my best friend – Amenuvor explains his presence at Ayine’s contempt hearing

6 days ago
J.B. Danquah murder: Lawyer rejects juror over possible social media influence

J.B. Danquah murder: Lawyer rejects juror over possible social media influence

2 weeks ago

Popular News

    Dennis Law News

    © COPYRIGHT 2020

    Navigate Site

    • Follow the Case
    • DL Write-up

    Follow Us

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Election Petition
      • All Documents Filed in Court by the Parties
      • Live Updates of court hearing
      • Timelines
      • Know your Judges
      • Summaries of the processes
    • Latest News
    • International News
    • Opinions/Features
    • Follow the Case

    © COPYRIGHT 2020

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Create New Account!

    Fill the forms below to register

    All fields are required. Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In